Thursday, March 10, 2005

More Updates on Offer #6

I can't recall who it was (BGinvestor?) that told me my closing cost figures seemed low (I mentioned $1500). Well, I'm here to publicly apologize, because they were correct and I was wrong. Not only are closing costs higher, but I failed to include the inspection in my initial analysis. I guess this is why they always say to add a cushion in for 'gotchas' - not only in repairs, but also in financing and other issues.

I met with my loan officer yesterday to go over the details of the financing. Since its a HUD, he said it would take them (HUD) longer than normal to close, so we would probably be looking at mid-to-late April. We then went over how I was going to finance the deal, and came up with the following strategy ...

First, I would get a short-term interest-only ARM at 8% (or close to it). He said I may have to pay a small prepay penalty, if I refinance the loan within a short period of time, but he is going to try to find a lender that doesn't have a prepay penalty or is very low. Soon after closing, I would refinance with a 30yr term at a lower rate. I've always held it in my head that when I refinanced, it would be for 80%FMV - thereby avoiding PMI. That's true, but my mind didn't think beyond the 80%FMV. My loan officer told me that since its an investment property, I could refinance up to 95%, if I wanted. This opened up new opportunities that I hadn't thought of before. I haven't run numbers yet on my specific situation to see if its a good option, but I'll give you an example:

Purchase Price: $103,500-
Upfront Costs: $ 3,500-
--------
Total $107,000-

FMV: $135,000

Refi (90%FMV): $121,500
Refi Costs: $ 2,000-
Recovery: $107,000-
--------
Total: $ 12,500

So, I refiance, pay off all my incurring debts for the property, have a new loan with a better rate, and cash-out $12.5k in equity for cash reserves (or whatever). Like I said, I have to run the numbers to see if this is an option for this particular property (and, if so, at what refi cash-out %), but it would definately ease some of the upfront $$$ pain. :-)

Also, while talking to my loan officer, I asked him if it would be better to create a corporation in the future as the entity for transactions. He said he wasn't at liberty to make such a judgement, but said he knows a very good CPA that handles mostly RE investors that I could contact. This was in the middle of our meeting, and I never did get the CPA's contact information. I'll call the loan officer back today and get it. It's ironic that I had just posted a reply in the Rich Dad's forums over this same scenario. I replied to someone who mentioned they needed to get a team together before investing. My reply mentioned that once you start making offers and getting them accepted, your team will start to form almost magically. This is a perfect example of exactly what I had meant.

2 comments:

Shaun said...

I forget - what was your plan for this property, rent or flip? If you are renting, be sure the payment on the 90% loan can be covered by the rent.

Steve said...

Originally, I was going to flip retail. I wanted to do this to start getting money in my pocket for future considerations. However, a lot of people here and elsewhere are telling me that this property seems ideal for long-term buy-n-hold. If I flip retail, I stand to make about $10k-$20k, but I won't have the property. If I end up going that route, I doubt I'll refinance as the costs wouldn't be worth it (I don't think). I still haven't had time to run numbers concretely on a rental or L/O, but earlu estimates showed it as being promising (50%+ ROI). These last few days, unfortunately, have been hectic at work (we lost two people on our team this last month, so more work for me), hectic at home (illness currently running in the family), and getting the "little things" in order for this property.

I wish this property would have landed about 3 weeks ago when I wasn't so busy! :-P